Recent content by ClarkGriswold

Having a candidate/president that does not allegedly crime would also solve this conundrum that @keokie lays out, yeah? I mean, that worked for 200 odd years pretty well…

Can you imagine Trump did that??? Good thing we don’t care about it.

Except as it applies to Trump, amirite? No reason to have a trial for him, he’s obviously innocent no matter how it looks!!! See, everyone else lies. Never him.

But you don’t know why, do you? You are just floating your theory. Prove it.

Show me the facts you have, firsthand, that support your “conspiracy” here.

An “outsider”…is that a euphemism for an imbecile? If so, I’d agree with you.

And you know the facts firsthand, right?

I suppose if I allegedly commit a crime, they will. And should.

Don’t care.

So, he says things that represent him to be ignorant, a liar or both…in an effort to troll those of us that already believe he is an ignorant liar?? And you think that is funny?

Is he lying or ignorant?

I’m not saying it as much the Oxford dictionary.

You wrote this. It reads that way.

I am time?

And why does FPOTUS need immunity if, as he claims, he has done nothing wrong? If that’s true, clearly the prosecution will not be able to demonstrate his guilt and he will be found not guilty by a jury of his peers. Right? No immunity needed if you haven’t committed a crime.