TRUMP 2024

LOL, you have no idea. Falsifying business records is a misdemeanor in NY. It only becomes a felony in NY if done in conjunction with the "intent to commit another crime". Your boy Alvin hasn't released the details on that "other crime".
Did you read the 16 page 34 count felony indictment?
 
There was a 'doorman' that was selling a story about an illegitimate Trump love child. He was asking for 30k. This was happening at the same time the Porn Queen was shopping her story.

The 'doorman' story was found to be a lie...I'd think Stormy could just as likely been trying to extort Trump. So there Trump is, false accusations being made against him....it would have damaging effects on a marriage or on the election. So what do you do, something has to be done to protect yourself.

Stormy took the money and talked anyway...there's plenty of folks out there that'll do that type of thing, like E. Jean did.
Who gives a flying fk who he screwed. BJ Billy let that cat our of the bag years ago.
 
I want to know if you're smart enough to think for yourself. Clearly, you are not. You don't even know what felony he's alleged to have committed. It's a wonder you can put your pants on in the morning -- or are you the guy walking the street in his underwear?
Did you read the indictment? My guess is you didn't.
 
Did you read the 16 page 34 count felony indictment?
Yep. 34 counts of the same thing with "different" documents. Please point us to the page where they disclose the underlying felony he was trying to "cover up."
 
Who gives a flying fk who he screwed. BJ Billy let that cat our of the bag years ago.
You certainly are wound up today. Seems you can't handle the trial of Trump.
 
Not me.

But I didnt’t allegedly try and cover it up. And then falsify business records to cover it up. Allegedly.
A jury will decide on this case but this is day 1 of a 6 week trial. The Trumpers on here heads will explode at the rate they are going. They don't care about evidence and due process of law.
 
You certainly are wound up today. Seems you can't handle the trial of Trump.
Nah, I can't handle your sheer stupidity.

Again, articulate the underlying felony. Prove to us you can do it.
 
You hit on it. Before. The. Election. That’s the crime.

The alleged affairs allegedly happened in 2006. If he was worried about Melania he had a decade to solve that, quietly. Or before he ran for President. Not while running for president.

Allegedly.
Well....Since @Iprof couldn't tell us the "other crime" that would extend the statute and convert this from a misdemeanor to a felony, I will. The crux of Bragg's case is that he can "bootstrap" federal law. For the falsifying to become a felony there has to be done with the intent to commit another crime. The law Bragg is trying to bootstrap is federal campaign finance law. Federal prosecutors look at this already and declined to prosecute because the standard of proof is so high and there was not enough "evidence". Bragg has no jurisdiction over federal law, but that doesn't seem to bother these Soros "prosecutors" that seem to only prosecute Trump. There's a little more to it, but that's the basics. A friend that is a lawyer specializing in federal court told me that bootstraping federal law has never been successful.
 
Again, articulate the underlying felony. Prove to us you can do it.
Even IF he could, he absolutely refuses to.

Don’t believe he has ever given an answer (much less a straight answer) to any question put to him.

He’s a pathological liar.
 
Well....Since @Iprof couldn't tell us the "other crime" that would extend the statute and convert this from a misdemeanor to a felony, I will. The crux of Bragg's case is that he can "bootstrap" federal law. For the falsifying to become a felony there has to be done with the intent to commit another crime. The law Bragg is trying to bootstrap is federal campaign finance law. Federal prosecutors look at this already and declined to prosecute because the standard of proof is so high and there was not enough "evidence". Bragg has no jurisdiction over federal law, but that doesn't seem to bother these Soros "prosecutors" that seem to only prosecute Trump. There's a little more to it, but that's the basics. A friend that is a lawyer specializing in federal court told me that bootstraping federal law has never been successful.
Don't forget, they tried to prosecute John Edwards for the same conduct in 2012 and lost miserably.
 
Wrong, that's all we care about. Difference is we're smart enough to see when "due process of law" is applied differently based on the letter after someone's name.
LOL, you do nothing but bitch and complain about everything. You want others to explain to you how and why Chump was charged with a felony because you don't like the charges. Chump tried for what 2 years to have this case thrown out and the appeals court said no. A panel also reviewed if the judge had a conflict of interest and that went against Trump. But it's good to see dozing Don so relaxed he fell asleep in court.
 
Don't forget, they tried to prosecute John Edwards for the same conduct in 2012 and lost miserably.
I almost forgot about that. So different in the pre-Trump era.

For example:

When asked about Edwards' future in public service, Bonior further stated, "You can't lie in politics and expect to have people's confidence."


He was done in politics. Rightfully so.

See a difference in reaction?
 
LOL, you do nothing but bitch and complain about everything. You want others to explain to you how and why Chump was charged with a felony because you don't like the charges. Chump tried for what 2 years to have this case thrown out and the appeals court said no. A panel also reviewed if the judge had a conflict of interest and that went against Trump. But it's good to see dozing Don so relaxed he fell asleep in court.
Aren't you the one who constantly asks "did you read the indictment?" I ask because I know you can't answer. You just suckle on the teet of Rachel Maddow (actually I'm not sure that a thing) and repeat her talking points. I took the time to explain the theory Bragg is using, you should be grateful. ;)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,208
Messages
1,428,602
Members
61,109
Latest member
Minnervos
Back
Top