TRUMP 2024

The fact there are so many that believe this and other cases against Trump have anything to do with justice is sad. This is 100% election interference. The timing proves it. The funny part is it just may backfire. I don't think he could ever do enough to win NY . But he will open a lot of peoples eyes.
Yes. It IS election interference on trial. Specifically, New York Election Law 17-152, which prohibits conspiracies to promote the election of a specific candidate through unlawful means, is the crime that Trump was intending to commit or conceal.
 
Not if you value freedom and want to live in a true representative republic. If you want to live in a 3rd world banana republic, than yeah, it's funny. You do you.
I haven't committed any crimes. I am golden.
 
Yes. It IS election interference on trial. Specifically, New York Election Law 17-152, which prohibits conspiracies to promote the election of a specific candidate through unlawful means, is the crime that Trump was intending to commit or conceal.
Now that's funny shit. NDA's are suddenly unlawful.
 
Now that's funny shit. NDA's are suddenly unlawful.
GL3SPv-XMAAbL5C.jpeg
 
When you fudge the books in an effort to conceal the payment, is that lawful? You said you are a CFO. Is that lawful?
Depends on who it is concealed from: the IRS? Are you saying the payment was not a tax deduction? That would be a new theory. Stormy would be on the hook for paying the taxes. If Cohen, as Trump's attorney, advanced the payment and was reimbursed? That happens thousands of times every day at law firms across the country. I don't know what "fudge the books" means. By all accounts the expense was recorded, Bragg just doesn't like the way it was classified. That's a GAAP issue, not a legal one.
 
Depends on who it is concealed from: the IRS? Are you saying the payment was not a tax deduction? That would be a new theory. Stormy would be on the hook for paying the taxes. If Cohen, as Trump's attorney, advanced the payment and was reimbursed? That happens thousands of times every day at law firms across the country. I don't know what "fudge the books" means. By all accounts the expense was recorded, Bragg just doesn't like the way it was classified. That's a GAAP issue, not a legal one.
I guess we will find out. Are you listening to coverage today?
 
I guess we will find out. Are you listening to coverage today?
Why - we have you to tell us all about Stormy, hidden payments, etc. All completely “new” revelations that have been discovered since this came out in 2016. Discovered right before an election…..amazeballs o_O
 
Ah. Forgot you are a lawyer and a CFO.
Nope, not a lawyer. I was CFO of a law firm. His companies are private and the records supposedly being "falsified" (or "fudged" to use your term) were internal records. But I'm curious, which part of an attorney advancing costs on behalf of a client and getting reimbursed is illegal?
 
Nope, not a lawyer. I was CFO of a law firm. His companies are private and the records supposedly being "falsified" (or "fudged" to use your term) were internal records. But I'm curious, which part of an attorney advancing costs on behalf of a client and getting reimbursed is illegal?
In the run-up to an election? You tell me.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,237
Messages
1,429,058
Members
61,119
Latest member
KenBoat
Back
Top