TRUMP 2024

You're the one bitching about the price of ground beef and wanting the government to help you.
What do you suggest tell farmers, packing houses, wholesale outlet's and grocery stores how much they can sell their products for? I don't want the government setting prices on any goods.
There's a difference between commenting and "bitching". When did I ask for the govt. to help me? That is your area of expertise, sucking on the tax payer and hoping the government will fund your pension. I just want them to quit following policy that actively fucks the majority of the AMERICAN population.
 
Maybe if you had a little less HATE in your mind you would have some room for some intelligence and see some facts…it seems like you are a MAGA Trumper and you only see what he tells you to see. That’s fine, but why do you feel a need to mock and call everyone else names? It reminds me of someone and it certainly doesn’t hurt anyone’s feeling .
:D Just like liars accuse others of lying to them, haters accuse others of hating. Funny shit you post. But I am an America first patriot.
 
Maybe if you had a little less HATE in your mind you would have some room for some intelligence and see some facts…it seems like you are a MAGA Trumper and you only see what he tells you to see. That’s fine, but why do you feel a need to mock and call everyone else names? It reminds me of someone and it certainly doesn’t hurt anyone’s feeling .
Because you are fucking ignorant IDIOTS and not worth the TIME!
Tool^

:rolleyes:o_Oo_Oo_Oo_Oo_Oo_Oo_O:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:o_Oo_Oo_Oo_O:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
0B93F22E-54E3-4B1C-965D-D7B5743DBAFA.jpeg
 
Precisely because he ISN’T a politician.

Country would be in a lot better place financially if we’d had more businessmen (or at least had business experience) at the top.


Still think you’re an idiot bot,
prove me wrong.
When I was younger I agreed with the mythos that business leaders would make better government leaders. I voted for Ross Perot which in hindsight was a vote for Clinton.

Successful business people don't necessarily make good public servants. Government and business have different goals.

A successful businessperson chooses the best return on their resources. A successful politician treats the most population with resources at their disposal.

For example, a few pages earlier in this thread there was a comment that the USA would be better off with self directed social security.

That is a great business solution and sounds like a great governmental solution. Citizens get more money for what they have saved. What happens to the failures? Government deals with its failures as best it can where as business moves on as best it can from failures. I know people who lost all their IRA retirement money day trading. It was a thing in the 90's.

Government is a lot harder than business because government deals with its mistakes. A successful business abandons its mistakes.
 
When I was younger I agreed with the mythos that business leaders would make better government leaders. I voted for Ross Perot which in hindsight was a vote for Clinton.

Successful business people don't necessarily make good public servants. Government and business have different goals.

A successful businessperson chooses the best return on their resources. A successful politician treats the most population with resources at their disposal.

For example, a few pages earlier in this thread there was a comment that the USA would be better off with self directed social security.

That is a great business solution and sounds like a great governmental solution. Citizens get more money for what they have saved. What happens to the failures? Government deals with its failures as best it can where as business moves on as best it can from failures. I know people who lost all their IRA retirement money day trading. It was a thing in the 90's.

Government is a lot harder than business because government deals with its mistakes. A successful business abandons its mistakes.
Yawn.
 
My support also comes from he is not a politician. The republicans and democrats are afraid of him. He will and has put republicans in there place. Regardless of his demeanor he puts America first as should all politicians
I have no idea, why you want to follow a person who makes his team fear him. I want a leader that can elevate his allies. Oh well different strokes, as they say.

I've asked before; do you, or anyone, on the thread know what makes the US great? Why we are/were a leader in the world. I don't believe Trump knows but he might and be using it as a weakness to make people fear him.

I know why Republicans fear him. He is the consummate bully. Do you remember the first debate way back before he was elected calling everybody names, little Rubio, ugly wife Cruz, etc. Mean enough to belittle but not so mean that anybody was hugely offended.

I also disagree that he puts America first but that could be because I bought into the American myth, we're Rowdy Yates, lead by Gil Favor. Not so much whiny, lying, silverspoon sucking, billionaires who blame all their problems on others.
 
So you have no response, that is understandable, government is hard.
Government is not hard. In business, if you make a mistake it is costly eating up valuable and limited resources. The government does not have the same constraints. They either take our money now (taxes), take our future money (borrow) or devalue our money (print money). There is nothing hard there. Plus, the government does not usually deal with its mistakes (see Afghanistan withdrawal).
 

Government is not hard. In business, if you make a mistake it is costly eating up valuable and limited resources. The government does not have the same constraints. They either take our money now (taxes), take our future money (borrow) or devalue our money (print money). There is nothing hard there. Plus, the government does not usually deal with its mistakes (see Afghanistan withdrawal).
You mean a business mistake just like this lol:

 
You mean a business mistake just like this lol:

I figured it’d be the Iidiot crowing about that.

It’s all part of the the ‘tards plan to attempt to keep Trump from being re-elected.

Read the article. I did. Doubt any ‘tards read more than the headline.
 
I have no idea, why you want to follow a person who makes his team fear him. I want a leader that can elevate his allies. Oh well different strokes, as they say.

I've asked before; do you, or anyone, on the thread know what makes the US great? Why we are/were a leader in the world. I don't believe Trump knows but he might and be using it as a weakness to make people fear him.

I know why Republicans fear him. He is the consummate bully. Do you remember the first debate way back before he was elected calling everybody names, little Rubio, ugly wife Cruz, etc. Mean enough to belittle but not so mean that anybody was hugely offended.

I also disagree that he puts America first but that could be because I bought into the American myth, we're Rowdy Yates, lead by Gil Favor. Not so much whiny, lying, silverspoon sucking, billionaires who blame all their problems on others.
Because I like that someone will not just tow the line. Not sure why you think that is a bad thing. We have to many people who were eating paste glue in elementary school running governments in every country. You really think it's a good idea to blindly follow party lines. That's what's happening with our Supreme Court now. They rule on party lines not what's in the constitution. That's a big problem
 
That's what's happening with our Supreme Court now. They rule on party lines not what's in the constitution.
You lost me on that one!

I don’t pay that much attention to SCOTUS for the most part except for the occasional 2A case they take.


Examples?
 
This has been going on for many years now going back with RBG. If you look at recent rulings you will see that the liberal justices are more likely to vote in lock step while moderate conservative justices may dissent. To much data to post but in a nut shell the majority of cases heard in the past just over 50% would have a unanimous decision until the last 10 years or so. Now we are down to the 20% or so in unanimous decisions with the percentage of justices voting on party lines going way up. I could list some headline cases abortion gun rights EPA regulations. Not sure if I explained it right but bottom line is unanimous decisions are going down while party line decisions are going up
 
This has been going on for many years now going back with RBG. If you look at recent rulings you will see that the liberal justices are more likely to vote in lock step while moderate conservative justices may dissent. To much data to post but in a nut shell the majority of cases heard in the past just over 50% would have a unanimous decision until the last 10 years or so. Now we are down to the 20% or so in unanimous decisions with the percentage of justices voting on party lines going way up. I could list some headline cases abortion gun rights EPA regulations. Not sure if I explained it right but bottom line is unanimous decisions are going down while party line decisions are going up
This is why it's important for the GOP to take back the Senate and take back the WH. Imagine how much damage Joe would do to our constitutional republic if he got to appoint justices.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,299
Messages
1,430,240
Members
61,163
Latest member
Cobra1999
Back
Top