tdschafer
Well-Known Member
Not that I want to be dragged into this argument as I've learned that ignorance is bliss & internet arguments never change peoples minds. But, going by your logic, Rittenhouse had just as much of a right to be there as the first victim since his family lived there and more of a right than the other two lead recipients as it seems they traveled as much or more than he did to go there and destroy property.Here's the simple and obvious answer: 17 year old Rittenhouse was not a police officer, a fire-fighter or an EMT. He did not have to be there. He deliberately chose to be in a place no thinking person would go. He was armed and went looking for trouble.
Last edited: